Haida Nation v. B.C. (Minister of Forests) and Weyerhaeuser (2004)


“Whether the Crown has duty to consult and accommodate Aboriginal peoples prior to making decisions that might adversely affect their as yet unproven Aboriginal rights and title claims — Whether duty extends to third party.”

EAGLE has a concise case summary available online at
http://www.eaglelaw.org/litigation/featurecases/haidatfl39home/

Supreme Court of Canada ruling:
http://csc.lexum.org/en/2004/2004scc73/2004scc73.html 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *